15 November 2012

Good news for the environment:

No bar to strict regulation on shipbreaking

In an ironic twist to the saga of whether or not ships carrying toxic material would be allowed entry into the country, Bangladesh Ship Breakers Association (BSBA) has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court (HC) verdict given in 2009. This removes the last hurdle to the government's plans to formulate legislation on shipbreaking.

When Bangladesh Environment Lawyers' Association (BELA) filed the writ back in 2009, it came up against stiff resistance from BSBA which effectively put on ice plans to frame rules on regulating an unregulated shipbreaking industry. As there was no law in place that made it mandatory for the industry to obtain environmental clearance from the responsible department, Bangladesh had effectively become the dumping ground for some of the world's most toxic and dangerous derelict ships. Furthermore, no government regulation meant that workers' safety was also a non-issue resulting in unnecessary deaths and injuries to workers.

In light of the BELA's writ, the HC had directed the government to frame rules and regulations drawing on six international laws on the subject within three months. The formulation of Ship Breaking and Ship Recycling Rules, 2011, subsequently amended to meet HC directive in December 2012 lays the foundations for protecting workers and the environment. The new rules allows for import of ships for dismantling purposes only on the condition that they are decontaminated as per HC verdict in 2009. This is good news indeed. However, for the new law to act as deterrence in the interest of protecting the environment and workers' protection, active enforcement by the department of environment is mandatory. Without that, the new rules will be just another piece of legislation that will gather dust on the shelf while an already polluted environment continues to suffer degradation.

Source: The Daily Star. 15 November 2012
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=257491

14 November 2012

PLATFORM NEWS – JOINT PUBLICATION OF A POSITION PAPER ON SHIP RECYCLING BY THE PLATFORM AND GREENPEACE EU


The NGO Shipbreaking Platform and Greenpeace EU, both based in Brussels, published today a joint position paper on ship recycling called “A principled and practical solution for ship recycling: NGO Shipbreaking Platform and Greenpeace Position on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Ship Recycling (COM 2012/118)”. The position paper can be downloaded here and can also be found on our “European Campaign” web page: 

Event at the EU Parliament

This position paper comes a week after an event about shipbreaking took place at the European Parliament. The event, titled “Shipbreaking: taking responsibility for hidden costs” and which was hosted by Carl Schlyter MEP and was co-organised by the NGO Shipbreaking Platform, gathered a large crowd made of members of the European Parliament, the European Council, environmental activists, academics and industry representatives.

The event featured a panel discussion chaired by Mr Schlyter, who is the rapporteur to the Environment Committee of the European Parliament on the European Commission proposal for a ship recycling regulation. Amongst the panelists was Karl Falkenberg, director general of the DG Environment of the European Commission, who declared that EU-flagged ships (which are the only ships concerned by the Commission proposal in its current form) would not be allowed to be sold to ship recycling facilities using the beaching method. It was the first time that a representative from the Commission made a public statement against beaching as a possible method for recycling EU ships.

EU Commission proposal deemed illegal

Other panelists included Ludwig Krämer, environmental lawyer at ClientEarth, who explained that the Commission proposal in its current form is illegal. Mr Krämer said the proposal if adopted would effectively withdraw end-of-life ships from the EU Waste Shipment Regulation, whereas this is forbidden by law as the EU is bound by an international treaty known as the Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, which defines end-of-life ships as hazardous wastes. The EU has also made the export of these ships from the EU to developing countries illegal by transposing what is known as the Ban Amendment into EU law through the same Waste Shipment Regulation.

Jim Puckett, executive director of Basel Action Network (BAN), explained that the EU had always been a champion of the Ban Amendment and said that this Commission proposal was worrying as it represents a big step backwards if indeed the EU intends to continue protecting developing countries from becoming the dumping sites for richer countries’ hazardous waste.

Finally, Rizwana Hasan, chief executive of the Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA) and advocate at the Supreme Court of Bangladesh said that the EU Commission should make sure the waste present within EU-flagged ships is properly treated in the EU instead of being sent to developing countries like Bangladesh, who lack the proper facilities to effectively manage hazardous waste. She called on the European Commission to ban beaching for EU ships so that they would have to choose alternatives to developing countries using this method.

Harrowing documentary highlights fatal flaws of beaching

The event was also the occasion for Ralph Vituccio, an award-winning documentary film maker and Director of Media Development in Communications Design at Carnegie Mellon (USA), and his colleague Tom Clancey, a Los-Angeles-based cinematographer, to present the trailer of their upcoming documentary “The Shipbreakers”, filmed in the shipbreaking yards of Alang, India. The film makers shared with the audience their experience while filming in the yards, describing in detail the pollution they witnessed and the lack of proper equipment and infrastructure the shipbreaking workers have to deal with every day.

Source: Shipbreaking platform. 13 November 2012
http://www.shipbreakingplatform.org/platform-news-joint-publication-of-a-position-paper-on-ship-recycling-by-the-platform-and-greenpeace-eu/

13 November 2012

World Politics Corner: Ethics of shipbreaking

It is hard to imagine that Bangladesh  —  a bite-size country in the South Asian subcontinent  —  can have a monopoly on an industry. But it does. On top of being a top exporter of textiles and apparel, Bangladesh is home to a bustling and polemic shipbreaking industry.

According to the Economist, in 2008 Bangladesh accounted for half of the world’s shipbreaking activities. The industry began in the 1960s, after a Greek ship, the MD Alpine, washed up on the shores of the southeastern city of Chittagong. Locals in the area scrambled to dismantle it after realizing that they could make a profit by selling its parts.

Today, shipbreaking in Bangladesh is a multi-billion dollar industry that creates jobs and meets a growing demand from European countries for shipbreaking services. Every year, an average of 250 ships of all shapes an sizes  —  from gas tankers, cruise liners to cargo ships  —  meet their demise at the hands of barefooted, mud-faced, scrawny, yet sturdy, young men on the beaches of Chittagong.

Non-government organizations have repeatedly critiqued the shipbreaking industry for being hazardous to its laborers. Most workers pry off chunks of metal from with the help of nothing more than scrapyard blowtorches and calloused hands. The risk of injury is high, as is sickness from inhaling toxic fumes and overexposure to asbestos  —  a silicate mineral substance used in shipbuilding that is a known cause of cancer.

Furthermore, most workers are uneducated and unaware of their rights to file complaints if and when they suffer accidents or sickness. Without legal representation, they become expendable cogs, laboring for employers greedy for sizeable profit margins.

The industry has also been accused of resorting to child labor. In impoverished countries, children are always the most vulnerable demographic because they do not have to be paid a salary, and their voice is thought less of.

Shipbreaking poses problems not just for humans, but also for the environment. Firstly, the industry has transformed what once were pristine beaches in Chittagong into metallic graveyards dotted over with pools of grime and sludge. Secondly, some of the debris from dismantled ships gets dragged back into the ocean, where it threatens marine life.

In 2009, an advocacy group, the Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA), managed to persuade the Supreme Court to ban shipbreaking businesses that failed to meet certain environmental standards. The court’s ruling temporarily put a halt to the industry, leaving thousands of workers without jobs.

President Sheikh Hasina relaxed regulations in 2011 after realizing that shipbreaking was a profitable industry for Bangladesh. Despite its drawbacks, a World Bank study showed that shipbreaking in Bangladesh sustains 200,000 jobs. Anyone who has ever played Sim City knows that taking jobs away leads to riots. In a densely populated country like Bangladesh (over 150 million squished into 130,000 square kilometers), keeping citizens employed is a must.

Hefzatur Rahman, the president of the Bangladesh Ship Breaks Association, was thankful for the loosening of regulations, which he believes stunts an industry that helps Bangladesh in numerous ways. Ship building not only creates jobs but also supplies over half the country’s steel. According to consulting company IHS, Bangladesh now holds one-fifth of the shipbreaking industry  —  a far cry from its former place at the top spot, but it is a re-start.

Earlier this year, the European Union, no longer wanting to affiliate itself with the hazards of shipbreaking, proposed legislation stipulating that European ships can only be sold and delivered to yards in Bangladesh and India that meet environmental guidelines. These regulations also mandated that all ships coming from Europe be emptied of any toxic chemicals.

Key figures in Bangladesh’s shipbreaking industry claim that there is no reason to tighten regulations all over again. The secretary of the Bangladesh Ship Breakers Association, Nazmul Islam says that the industry is safer now with features like hospital beds for the injured, modern equipment and proper storage units for toxic elements like asbestos. The EU is not convinced and is still pushing for proposals that, if not met, will cast the shipbreaking industry into another period of austerity.

From an outsider’s perspective, investing in improved equipment and better working conditions is a small price to pay to keep an industry running that creates jobs and models the sentiment behind recycling — that is, that one person’s trash is another person’s treasure.

Source: The Knox Student. 7 November 2012
http://wordpress.theknoxstudent.com/blog/2012/11/07/world-politics-corner-ethics-of-shipbreaking/

7 shipbreaking yards fined:

Seven shipbreaking yards in Chittagong have been fined a total of Tk 34.80 lakh for not complying with 56 conditions of Environment Clearance Certificate.

Monowar Islam, director general of the Department of Environment (DoE), awarded the fine at a hearing at the port city on Thursday.

Owners and representatives of the companies attended the hearing in response to a summons issued by the DoE, reports our correspondent in Chittagong.

United Ship Recycling Ltd was fined Tk 6.50 lakh, Shima Steel Tk 7 lakhs, Mamun Steel Tk 5.50 lakh, Mahin Enterprise Tk 3.30 lakh, Al Safa Stee Millsl Ltd Tk 3.50 lakh, KSB Steel Tk 2.50 lakh and Sayeed Steel Tk 6.50 lakh, Monowar said at a press conference.

Besides, Mamun Steel was asked to halt scraping of ships until further order and to remove two scrapped ships from Sitakunda shipbreaking yards, the DG told reporters after the hearing at the DoE Chittagong office.

Earlier on Tuesday, the DoE summoned the seven owners seeking explanations as to why they had not fulfilled the conditions mentioned in the Environment Clearance Certificate.

Source: Daily Star. 25 October 2012
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=41956

Shipbreaking in Bangladesh: Hard to break up

A controversial industry says it is cleaning up its act. Activists still want it shut

IN THE 1960s the MD Alpine, a Greek ship, washed up on a beach in Chittagong. Locals scurried out to the vessel and pulled off what they could. A cheap and resilient labour force, coupled with flat beaches for intentional strandings, ushered in the start of a new industry for Bangladesh: dismantling the great hulks of the sea and selling their steel for scrap.

At its height in 2008 Bangladesh’s ship-breaking industry accounted for half of all ships scrapped in the world, according to IHS, a consultancy. Today the country accounts for around a fifth.

In these years Bangladeshi ship breakers found themselves at the forefront of criticism as NGOs and pressure groups exposed some of the worst practices causing environmental and human harm. These included high health risks due to injuries, noxious fumes and the handling of asbestos. Critics say one way in which Bangladesh competes on cost is that poor workers are unlikely to file claims for accidents or bad health. Another advantage is (or was) the use of child labour.

In 2009 the Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA), a public-advocacy group, convinced the Supreme Court to ban all ship recycling not meeting certain environmental standards. The court’s decision meant that by 2010 the ship-breaking industry had come to a halt. Zahirul Islam of PHP, a local manufacturer with a big ship-breaking division (the industry prefers to call it ship recycling), says that for 14 months the company was unable to import a single vessel for breaking.

Knock-on effects hurt the wider economy. A World Bank study estimated that ship breaking employed over 200,000 in Bangladesh. Many of the jobs were subsequently lost. And domestic steel prices rose sharply. Half of all Bangladesh’s steel comes from breaking ships.

Under pressure from the ship breakers, Bangladesh’s prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, has since relaxed the regulations. Hefzatur Rahman, president of the Bangladesh Ship Breakers Association, believes this has saved the industry. From just a score of vessels scrapped in the main part of Chittagong two years ago, about 150 were broken up in 2011.

Greens are not happy and want the ban reimposed. Delphine Reuter of the Shipbreaking Platform, an NGO in Brussels, describes ship recycling as “close to slavery”. It and BELA are leading the call for more regulation. That bothers international shipping firms and ship brokers, which argue that Bangladeshi ship breakers have cleaned up their act.

At the International Maritime Organisation, the UN agency responsible for curbing shipping pollution and ensuring safety, the head of pollution prevention, Nikos Mikelis, says environmentalists present Bangladesh with a false choice. “They say they are happy to have the industry, but not on the beaches. Where do they want it? In the mountains?”

Source: Economist. 27 October 2012
http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21565265-controversial-industry-says-it-cleaning-up-its-act-activists-still-want-it-shut-hard-break