KANNUR: Thirty years ago when they were children they
rushed to the seashore to witness the arrival of a vessel to the ship-breaking
yard of Steel Industrials Kerala Ltd (SILK) at Azheekkal, located near the
estuary where the Valapattanam river falls into the Arabian Sea, 11 km from
here.
Now, as they take part in a relay hunger strike
against ship breaking, sitting under a shamiana on the side of the road leading
to SILK, they contemplate with a heavy heart how in three decades’ time the
yard has shattered their expectations by polluting the earth, air and
water. Speaking to Express on Wednesday,
District Collector P Balakiran revealed that the ship- breaking unit didn’t
have licences of the Pollution Control Board and the civic body. He added the SILK management had been asked to
obtain the within a week.
The anti-shipbreaking committee has locked horns with
the Joint Council of Trade Unions, represented by the CITU, INTUC and the STU.
Political parties have declared that they are determined to save SILK, a public
sector undertaking that had been making good profit over the last few years
after a period of crisis.
But leaders of the strike argue that SILK could be
saved even if it stopped ship breaking and undertook other construction
projects and continued building and boats and vessels. The unit started ship
breaking in 1984 and over the last three decades it has dismantled 30 ships.
International NGO Greenpeace said in 2003 that the
ship breaking at Azheekkal was going to be as dangerous as that in the yards at
Alang in Gujarat, the world’s largest ship-breaking centre.
SILK officials say all arguments of the action
committee were baseless and that the unit started dismantled ships only after
obtaining all necessary certificates.
“The Port Department and Customs Department have
approved the ship-breaking procedures and we are always vigilant to adhere to
environmental protection norms. We will be allowed to break a ship only after
the physical examination of these aspects is completed by the port officer,”
unit manager P Manoharan said.
He said people affected with diseases like asthma
were falsely projected as victims of pollution caused by the ship-breaking
unit.
But Shajahan, convener of the committee, said: “The
Basel convention of the United Nations and the International Maritime
Organisation have issued several guidelines regarding the trans-boundary
movement of hazardous waste and its dumping especially in regard to the
dismantling of old ships but all such stipulations are totally flouted here. An
activity like dumping of hazardous materials should never be carried out in a
densely populated area like Azheekkal which has immense ecological significance
too. Most of the workers at the ship-breaking unit here are migrant labourers
from Gujarat, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha who seem to be little aware of
the health hazards,” he said. “The living conditions of these workers
accommodated amid heaps of hazardous waste are appalling. Moreover, the ships
are dismantled not after dragging them to the shore, which is mandatory. All waste
is mixed in the river,” said committee chairman M K Manoharan.
Maritime legal expert V M Syam Kumar said though
India was not party to any international treaty on ship breaking, the Supreme
Court in the Exxon Valdez case had made it clear that the county was bound to
follow all norms of the Basel convention. “While dealing with an ownership
dispute over a ship brought for dismantling I came to know that the unit in
Azheekkal was not following many norms,” he said.
Fisherfolk who say the fish stock in the river and
its estuary has become almost nil are the worst-hit. According to them, long
prawn, crab and some other fishes unique to the region, which they used to export have vanished. Many
of the fishermen have take up other jobs. “We are disappointed that despite
repeated pleas, the government has not yet appointed an expert committee to
study the grave issue affecting our livelihood,” said Araya Samajam president K
P Madanan. The Azeekkal Boat Owners Association, Valakkar Sangam, Fishermen
Health Council and the Kerala Fish Merchants Association have extended support
to the stir.
Major health hazards the locals complain about are
respiratory problems, skin deceases and eye disorders.
The activists said that asbestos, arsenic, lead,
chromium, organotins, dioxins and poly cycleic aromatic hydro carbon compounds
that get mixed in river as a result of the ship breaking process can cause
everything from itching in the eyes to cancer and genetic disorders. A Kerala
Sasthra Sahithya Parishad team which visited Silk said ship breaking could be
carried out provided absolute transparency was maintained in the operations.
Though political parties except the BJP, RMP and the
SDPI pooh-pooh the arguments of environmentalists, members of almost all
parties make their presence felt on the protest front.
Hence, agitators are often seen blocking and
questioning people’s representatives and political leaders who drop by to
express their “solidarity”. Protesters had laid siege to the unit’s entrance,
preventing truck movement. As the latest
rounds of talks with the District Collector turned fruitless, the committee is
planning to go ahead with the stir consolidating popular support from various
quarters.
Source: new Indian
express. 26th May 2014
http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/Locals-up-in-Arms-against-SILK-Ship-breaking-Unit/2014/05/26/article2245433.ece
No comments:
Post a Comment