08 May 2017

Oil at Sea: Dangers of shipbreaking fading in


Dumping oil in the sea is prohibited as per the environmental act, but many of the shipbreaking yards in Sitakunda upazila of Chittagong do not follow the rule while dismantling ships.

As a result, the brunt oil, which is being thrown into the Bay of Bengal from the dismantled ships, is posing a serious threat to the environment.

According to sources, more than a hundred shipbreaking yards have mushroomed in the upazila over the last 20 years. Of them, around 50 to 60 yards are active at present.

Azhar-ul-Islam, inspector of the Department of Environment (DoE), Chittagong, said according to the oil management guideline of the environmental act, the authorities of the shipbreaking yards will have to remove the oil from the dismantled ships in a way that it does not harm the environment.

“Nevertheless it is a reality that in many yards oil is being thrown into the water during dismantling the ships or while being poured into barrels before delivering them to other ships,” he said.

“I am the lone inspector for the whole district, so it is not possible for me to visit all the yards regularly. Besides, there is a shortage of manpower in DoE,” he further said.

Recently, this correspondent managed to collect some photographs taken at a yard in Sonaichhari union of the upazila. In the photographs it was seen that oil dumped from ships was floating on the water, and at some spots, oil was found on the sand near the water.

Some of the workers seeking anonymity at the shipbreaking yards admitted that they throw oil in the water regularly.

Contacted, President of Bangladesh Ship Breakers' Association Abu Taher said, “In most of the yards oil is delivered through lighter vessels from one ship to another, and there is no question of dumping oil into the sea or at yards as this work is done very carefully.”

When this correspondent told him that he had seen oil floating on the water and had some photographs of oil spillage at a yard, Taher said it could be a “rare incident".

“Oil is stored in barrels or drums in few yards and leakage of oil might have happened during the process,” he said, adding, “We are trying to bring all the yards under the modern system of oil management.”

Contacted, Masud Karim, director of DoE, Chittagong, said they did not get any complaint regarding oil dumping into water at the shipbreaking yards.

“When we give clearance to any shipbreaking yard, it is clearly mentioned in the conditions that the yards must dispose oil without harming the environment.”

“There is no scope for dumping oil in yards during dismantling of ships,” he said, adding, “We will investigate the matter.”

If any shipbreaking yard disposes oil violating the environmental law, they will be fined, said DoE Inspector Azhar, adding, the amount of fine will depend on the extent of damage.

It will not be less than Tk 5 lakh, he further said.

DoE can also file a case against the yard responsible, and if the offence is proved in court, the yard owner may be sentenced to the highest 10 years' imprisonment, he said.

The environment clearance of the yard may also be cancelled, he added.

Contacted, Dr Hussain Jamal, a professor of the Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries of Chittagong University, said if oil is being dumped in the sea, it creates a longtime impact on the biodiversity as the degradation process of oil is very slow.

A large portion of oil remains in the water for long and affects the biodiversity, he said.

It has a bad impact not only on phytoplankton and zooplankton but also on birds hovering over the sea to catch fish, he said, adding, continuous dumping of small quantities of oil slowly add up to a large amount and block the sunlight from entering into the sea water.

Oil also reduces the dissolved oxygen in water and ultimately fisheries get affected, he said.

In a recent study by the Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries of CU, some findings suggested that biodiversity of Sitakunda is poorer than that of other areas, Dr. Hussain added.

Source: the daily star. 07 May 2017

Shipbreaking continues to pollute


First it was toxic materialsin the ships, hauled to the breaking yard for scrapping, which posed hazard to the environment as well as to the workers and people living in the surrounding areas. Now we have to contend with the shipbreaking yards disgorging burnt oil of the dismantled ships into the Bay of Bengal. And this is happening in the country's largest shipbreaking complex in Sitakunda. It is no wonder that the recent study carried out by the Marine Department of Chittagong University shows that the biodiversity of Sitakunda is poorer than that of the other areas surrounding it.

The reported statement of the director of the Chittagong Department of Environment (DoE), that the department has not received any complaint regarding the dumping is quite puzzling. We wonder who is going to inform him about the pollution. The polluters? We understand he has his inspectors to exercise watch over these establishments. And they are certainlynot doing their duty if he doesn't know that one of his areas of watch is being severely polluted by the errant shipbreaking yard owners.

Admittedly, the shipbreaking industry is of considerable relevance to our economy, and it poses both opportunities and challenges. But the opportunities have been exploited while meeting the demand for raw material for our steel mills. While laws exist to protect the coastal belt and regulate the industry, which has mushroomed over the last decade, the oversight appears to be extremely loose. Deliberate breach of the laws by the owners in cahoots with some unscrupulous officials compounds the problem. Our coastal belt management must be strengthened and the local DoE officials must deal strictly and promptly with the violators.

Source: the daily star. 08 May 2017

10 April 2017

Design for recycling: a route to green ship recycling

Ship recycling at the end of a ship’s useful life aims to make the shipping industry more environmentally sustainable and is a major source of employment in developing countries. However, there are associated health, safety and environmental concerns. This study argues these concerns are due to inappropriate design and explains how ‘design for recycling’ can reduce the costs and risks of ship recycling.

The final stage of a ship’s life cycle — recycling — is essential for renewal of the shipping fleet. On average, 96% of the ship can be recycled or reused. The re-use of increasingly scarce materials also reduces the burden that shipping places on natural resources, improving the environmental sustainability of the industry.

Ship recycling also supports the developing economies of several countries, such as Bangladesh, China, India, Pakistan and Turkey, which together represent 97% of the world’s ship recycling capacity. However, current recycling practices can have negative social and environmental impacts. Ships contain toxic materials, such as asbestos and heavy metals, which many ship recycling hubs do not have the infrastructure to treat, generating health and safety concerns for workers and contaminating the natural environment.

Awareness of the risks of ship recycling was first raised in the early 1990s, leading the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to adopt the Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships in 2009. More recently, the EU has published a Ship Recycling Regulation, which aims to reduce the negative impacts caused by recycling EU Member State-flagged ships.

The researchers of this paper argue that, to address the negative impacts of ship recycling properly, hazards must be considered during the design process. ‘Design for recycling’, a concept which involves identifying the recycling challenges during the design stage, has already been successfully applied in the automobile industry. In the context of ships, it could involve identifying hazards, such as toxic paints, or inefficiencies, such as oil tanks that must be manually cleaned before they can be recycled.

Their basic principle is for ship designers to ensure that recycling is as safe, efficient and environmentally friendly as possible. Not only would this prevent or reduce the use of materials, such as asbestos, PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), heavy metals and oils (e.g. residual fuels), that could be a threat to workers and the local environment during dismantling, it would also reduce risk throughout the ship’s life-cycle, decreasing risks to builders and crew members.

The concept has three key objectives:
- providing an accurate inventory of hazardous materials,
- reducing or replacing hazardous materials, and
- making the ship easy to dismantle.

The latter could be achieved by using techniques such as standardisation of all parts and equipment on every ship to make it easier to identify the components of end of life ships for potential re-use, remanufacturing or recycling. Other techniques for ease of dismantling would be to include properly designed lifting supports for handling dismantled structural parts to minimise accidents due to falling components. The key objectives could be incorporated into design rules through IMO codes, for example.

However, there are concerns about the impact that implementing these changes would have on the costs of building and operating ships. To deal with these additional costs, the researchers suggest that the expense of creating inventories of hazardous materials should be borne by the ship owner (as in the ‘polluter pays’ principle). They also say costs should be calculated for different replacement materials and design changes in order to identify the most affordable options. The authors say the negative impacts of ship recycling presently undermine the industry’s contribution to sustainable development. With this paper, they describe a method, with techniques for efficient ship dismantling, to reduce these negative impacts by improving ship design and, ultimately, to achieve cost-effective green ship recycling.

Source: European Commission. Thematic Issue 55. June 2016. Ship Recycling: Reducing Human and Environmental Impacts

March has been a very busy month for the GMS Green Team!

A weekly training programme for a selection of ship recycling yard workers in Alang has been initiated under our CSR & RSPR programs. Navyug Ship Breaking yard (Plot no.153M) in Alang was the first yard where the workers’ training programme took place under the care and guidance of Dr. Anand Hiremath, our Green recycling Lead Co-ordinator in Bhavnagar who is leading our responsible ship recycling activation and oversees the implementation of our RSPR program.

 

The yard workers were trained on safe-for-entry procedures and work in confined spaces while engaging in onboard cutting processes using an oxy-LPG torch. Other subjects that were covered in detail, included: the use of a selfcontained breathing apparatus (SCBA), understanding confined spaces using a General Arrangement (GA) plan, emergency evacuation and rescue plan while working in a confined space, the use of a multi gas detector and the role of helpers during the cutting process on-board. We are also quite proud to announce that Dr. Hiremath has just been awarded the “Approved HazMat Expert” certificate from DNV-GL in Piraeus, adding more value to the extensive portfolio of services we provide to our esteemed Clientele globally.


Dr. Hiremath will be preparing and overseeing the implementation of IHM (Inventory of Hazardous Materials) an important step before the actual recycling process of a vessel begins. GMS is the first and only cash buyer of ships and offshore assets able to provide this special service. Last, we have just produced a really useful manual: The GMS Green Handbook: A Practical Guide to Monitor Safe and Environmentally Friendly Ship Recycling.


This guide covers ISO 9000, 14000, 18000 & 30000, HKC, EUSRR, Social Accountability aspects, ILO, Basel Technical Guidance on full and partial recycling of ships, Ship Breaking Code 2013 and many more. The purpose of this guide is to undertake a comprehensive, targeted evaluation for delivering responsible ship recycling practices at yards under the supervision and guidance of our GMS Green Team in a step-by-step approach while covering aspects of health, safety and working conditions in an effort to prove that “zero accidents at yards and near-zero pollution to the surrounding environment” is achievable.

Source: hellenic shipping news. 10 April 2017

09 April 2017

Ship Arrested in Norway Following Disastrous Flight to Asian Recycling Yard:


Norway has arrested a ship which had to be rescued as it fled to a notorious South Asian recycling yard following a tip off that it had been sold illegally.

The Norwegian environmental authorities have arrested a ship following a tip off that it had been sold illegally and was destined for breaking in a dirty and dangerous South Asian recycling facility.

NGO Shipbreaking Platform and its member organisation Bellona explained that the vessel, is not allowed to leave Norway unless it is to sail to a ship recycling destination in line with international and European hazardous waste laws. According to the Norwegian Environment Agency, it is the first arrest of a vessel in Norway for the illegal export of hazardous waste..

The Platform explained that it had been informed already during the summer of 2015 that the ship was sold for scrap.

Having been laid up for many years on the Norwegian west coast the Platform said that it immediately contacted the Norwegian owners, Eide Group, to make them aware of the laws governing end-of-life ships and that exporting the vessel to a South Asian beaching yard would be in breach of the European Waste Shipment Regulation and the UN Basel Convention. Eide Group was said to have denied then that the vessel would be scrapped.

According to Shipbreaking Platform on 22 February 2017 the vessel attempted to leave Norway under a new name, flag and registered owner.

Now called TIDE CARRIER, the ship was said to have swapped its flag to that of Comoros and was registered under an anonymous St. Kitts and Nevis based post-box company, Julia Shipping. The organisation said that these are all solid indications that a cash buyer, a scrap dealer specialised in the trading of end-of-life ships to the South Asian beaching yards, was involved.

Drama on the High Seas
The TIDE CARRIER however ran into difficulties as the engine stopped working outside the Norwegian coast of Jaeren. The coastguards were forced to trigger a salvage operation, complicated by way of the weather conditions, to avoid the risk of oil spill and grounding close to one of the most renowned beaches in Norway.

The rescue operation included the emergency evacuation of five crew members – one of which suffered from a broken shoulder – and the deployment of two tugboats to bring the ship to safety.

Norwegian authorities have since then been trying to trace the owner and insurer of the vessel, given that someone should be held accountable for the costs of the rescue operation incurred by the Norwegian state.

While the authorities investigated the ownership and condition of the vessel, it remained docked in Gismarvik, Norway.

“We immediately informed Norwegian authorities that the ship was most likely sold for scrapping in South Asia and also that there were suspicions that the ship had been used to store hazardous sludge,” said Ingvild Jenssen, director at the NGO Shipbreaking Platform.

The Platform added that on Monday 4 April the Environment Agency and the Police found evidence that the vessel was under a “break up voyage” insurance from Norway to Gadani, Pakistan. They were also said to have found unidentified and excessive amounts of sludge and fuel oils.

What’s in a Name?
According to the NGO the previous week, while the vessel was still in the dock, the TIDE CARRIER changed name to HARRIER and changed from Comoros to another popular end-of-life flag - Palau.

Consequently, it was said to have became clear that the repair contract from Oman which had been provided to the Norwegian authorities as a way to escape checks for the illegal export of the vessel was false. Revelations of the attempt of the ship’s illegal export and subsequent breaking on the Gadani beach resulted in the arrest of the ship.

Shipbreaking Platform warned that this is not the first time cash buyers have sought to circumvent environmental protection laws by providing fake contracts of repair or further operational use.

Recently the Norwegian owned CITY OF TOKYO was said to have been allowed to leave the port of Antwerp under the pretence of repair work in Dubai – instead it sailed directly to the infamous beaching yards in Bangladesh.

The FPSO NORTH SEA PRODUCER was also said to have been illegally exported from the UK to Bangladesh under the pretence of further operational use in Nigeria. Cash buyer GMS reportedly used grey- and black listed Paris MoU flags and established anonymous post box companies in both cases.

“The cash buyers of TIDE CARRIER will not only have to pay back the Norwegian authorities for the rescue operation, but will also have to answer for the fake repair documents which were used to let it sail in the first place,” said Jenssen.

Norwegian owner Eide will have to be held responsible for having sold to a cash buyer as this clearly indicates their complicity in the attempt to illegally export the ship and the potentially toxic excess sludges and fuels found on board,” she concluded.

Source: waste management world. 06 April 2017