18 June 2007

Able U.K. Wins Ghost Ship Battle:

The scrapping of so-called ghost ships on Teesside looks likely to go ahead, reported the BBC. Able U.K. won a contract with the U.S. government to dismantle up to 13 vessels at its Hartlepool yard, and 4 ships arrived in late 2003. But delays caused by environmental and planning concerns prevented any work. Hartlepool Council has now removed the final hurdle, by admitting it can no longer block planning permission.


The dismantling plans were dogged by debate over the potential impact on the surrounding area and wildlife. Last year, Hartlepool councilors threw out a number of planning applications by Able UK. Now, the authority has said new government planning policies mean it has no chance of successfully challenging an appeal by Able UK to the Planning Inspectorate.

Able UK has welcomed the decision, which came too late to save an order from the US government to scrap a further 9 vessels on Teesside.

Source: Marine Link (Sourced from BBC). Monday, 18 June 2007

10 January 2007

Oriana Cruise Ship:



Another of the world's greatest ocean liners has made her final voyage. Scott Baty marks the end of P&O's legendary first Oriana...20 years after she left the South Pacific for the Orient.

For Sydneysiders, a glimpse of the majestic Oriana as she glided through the waters of Port Jackson, or towering over her Circular Quay berth, was as familiar a sight as the Opera House and Harbour Bridge...almost part of the waterfront panorama for more than a quarter of a century.

For many thousands of Australians, Oriana - or the "Big O", a sobriquet she was irreverently accorded by some passengers - was to provide a first experience of ocean travel to Europe and North America, and South Pacific/Orient cruising. Such was her popularity and following, that Oriana's name, and that of P&O, dominated leisure travel long before the start of the 20th century.

Then, in May 1986, she was gone, with only the memories and legends remaining. But, in 1994, her name was proudly accorded by P&O to a luxurious 70,000-ton cruise ship, upon which many Australians and New Zealanders have more recently world-cruised.

Many assumed that the original Oriana had followed many of her contemporaries to Asia's voracious shipbreakers. That did eventually happen, but only just recently, as her post-P&O career records. Indeed, as this edition goes to press, so her remains enter the smelters of China's burgeoning steel industry.

Although she flew the Iberian ensign of P&O for most of her years in service, Oriana was not actually built for that company. The original Oriana was launched in 1959 as the largest - and, as it transpired, last - of a fleet of Orient Steam Navigation Company liners to serve the Australia route since 1853.

Known as "The Orient", the company had operated 53 ships between England and Australia prior to the maiden voyage of Oriana in 1960. All but a few had names with the Orient Line prefix 'Or', for example. Orontes, Orion, Orvieto, Orama.

The advent of Oriana to the round-world service was a major event, and caused rival P&O to order the similar-sized, but vastly different, Canberra which entered service six months later. The companies would merge in 1964, and the two new ships would subsequently operate as "sisters" until 1986.

Hundreds of thousands turned out in January 1961 to greet the new Oriana wherever she called on her maiden round-world voyage. At Sydney, her half-way, 5-day stopover port, she was the first ship to berth at the new Overseas Passenger Terminal, built expressly to accommodate her size.

Oriana made maritime history on that voyage, breaking the speed record for Southampton/Sydney, and trans-Tasman and trans-Pacific crossings...they stand unchallenged to this day.

When times changed, during the late '70s, Oriana was increasingly used by P&O for cruising; scheduled seasonally for Mediterranean voyages ex-Southampton, and Pacific and Asian voyages ex-Sydney. For the last five years of her P&O career she was based permanently at Sydney in competition with Sitmar Line's Fairstar and an assorted CTC Cruises fleet.

Laid-up at Sydney's Pyrmont basin for several months in early 1986, time indeed seemed to have caught-up with the otherwise still pristine Oriana. In an increasingly cost-conscious and luxury discerning market, her thirst for costly fuel, and complex original two-class passenger configuration marked her as unsuitable for future trading, and P&O caveats precluded her for future service under another flag. It was widely predicted she would follow her former '60s Orient consorts Orcades, Orsova and Oronsay to the scrapyards of Taiwan.

Then came a lifeline - of sorts. A new career under a very different Orient flag.

Oriana, sadly, did not leave Sydney proudly under her own steam. It was considered to be more economical to tow her away, rather than fuelling her for one last time and, after delaying extended waterfront disputes, she was towed by tugs, bound for Japan, where a new career as a convention centre/hotel/tourist attraction awaited her at a port south of Tokyo.

There she remained, patronised by thousands of visitors annually, including occasionally nostalgic admirers from her former ports-of-call. A decade later when her usefulness and novelty having declined, Oriana was again taken in tow, this time headed westward to China's developing super-city Shanghai.

Given a much-needed cosmetic external renovation, and internal restructuring, her new career in China was to be much the same as during Japanese ownership.

During 2004 "obituaries" were published abroad of the sinking of Oriana during a cyclonic storm which swept North-East China. The news reports were premature, however, although the ship had broken her moorings and holed her underwater hull. Photographs showed the ship listing markedly to port, but Oriana was still afloat.

To all but her most optimistic admirers it was obvious that her supposed sinking was a prelude to a likely end for Oriana, and therefore it was with no great surprise that she was to be moved from Shanghai's redeveloped waterfront park area. It was hoped that she might again be reprieved and find suitable deployment, perhaps elsewhere on China's coast.

The axe finally fell in March 2006, and Oriana, the last flagship for "the Orient", the last of the combined P&O-Orient liners, and the ship which arguably most established P&O Cruises in Australia during the '70s and '80s, was again towed away, this time to an adjacent shipbreaking yard.

It is perhaps ironic to consider that perhaps a little of the steel which made Oriana the magnificent example of engineering - the largest ship ever built on England's shores - which astounded the world in on her 1960/61 maiden voyage may return to our shores in the form of a Bunnings garden spade, or a Shanghai-built Volkswagen.

Source: Scott Baty, Issue 26, Summer 2006-2007

02 January 2007

A China Environmental Health Project Fact Sheet:

A Toxic Trade: Shipbreaking in China

In recent years, the international dialogue on pollution in the shipping industry has shifted from waste on ships to ships as waste. Industrialized countries with aging fleets of oil tankers and military vessels have found it cheaper to sell these retired ships to developing countries where they are dismantled for scrap than to do such work domestically. As recently as 2004, China dominated this dangerous business of shipbreaking. While today Bangladesh has assumed this position due primarily to price competitiveness, industrialized countries view China’s shipbreaking industry—while still highly polluting—as a more hitech and somewhat more “respectable.” The addition of shipbreaking to the Basel Convention and growing news media coverage of the hazardous waste pollution dangers of shipbreaking highlight how China is likely to continue to be a major player in this industry. The hunger for steel in China fuels demand for expanding shipbreaking operations, however, the practice of shipbreaking is posing serious danger to the health of workers and the coastal environment.

Health and Environmental Costs

Most ships that are ready to be dismantled were built in the 1970s, before many hazardous materials were banned. These older ships contain potentially health-damaging substances such as the fire retardant asbestos; the anti-corrosives lead oxide and zinc chromate; and antifouling paints that often contain mercury, arsenic, and tributyl tin (TBT). Similar to other developing countries, shipbreaking in China is often done by workers who lack proper equipment or protective gear.* Most of these workers are migrants from rural areas who are poorly paid and also do not receive any health care coverage for their work. Thus, workers injured from toxins or accidents on the shipbreaking site often must impoverish their families to receive medical treatment. After boats are dismantled, the waste is rarely appropriately disposed. Moreover toxic waste may burn in open fires and carcinogenic material is casually sold for re-use.

Where Shipbreaking is Taking Place

China has approximately 90 breaking yards dotting the deltas and lower reaches of the Pearl and Yangtze rivers. The major shipbreaking yard is Zhang Jiagang in Jiangsu Province and there are additional breaking yards in Fujian and Guangdong provinces. China is the only nation where scrap ships are not beached, which makes it easier for ship exporters to deliver them to be demolished.

Addressing the Problem

Despite impacts on health and environment, the global practice of ship breaking continues due of the lack of regulation enforcement in the countries of both ship exporters and importers. The recent introduction of stricter environmental and safety laws in China has arguably made the industry less profitable, but has in no way brought it to a halt. Unlike electronic waste, the informal sector for shipbreaking (due to the massive size of the ships) is small to nonexistent, which means all ship breaking in China is recognized as legitimate by the government.

The Basel Convention now specifically prohibits the transfer of hazardous ships, i.e., those that have not been cleaned of all hazardous waste, from developed (OECD) countries to developing countries. The Chinese government, which has ratified the Basel Convention, still uses subsidies to promote the industry. For example, in 2004, the customs duty on ships for demolition in China was only 5 percent and a capital subsidy of 14 percent was provided to shipbreaking companies.

The Basel Action Network (BAN), a global watchdog organization dedicated to halting exports of toxic waste from rich to poor countries, has successfully halted the export of some U.S. military ships to China as scrap. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency bans the export of certain toxic materials, which are often prevalent on older ships. With a focus on the growing number of deaths and illnesses of workers in this industry, BAN, Greenpeace and human rights groups are campaigning together to halt this trade.

Greenpeace China used to include shipbreaking in its toxics campaigning, but has not focused on the issue since publishing a report in 2000 on how the industry was polluting China’s coastal areas and communities. Certain private companies, such as the Dutch shipping company, P&O Nedlloyd, are working to improve the impact of shipping yards in China on environment and health.

Future CEF Coverage of Shipbreaking Issues in China

The China Environment Forum will be adding other fact sheets on this and other waste topics throughout 2007 and 2008.

References

“Shipbreaking: Toxic Waste in Disguise, the China Connection.” Greenpeace, Washington DC.

“Port Resources, China.” Global Marketing Systems, Inc. Cumberland, MD.

“The Ship Recycling Industry: Where It’s Done.” Global Marketing Systems, Inc. Cumberland, MD. http://www.gmsinc.net/gms/recycling_industry.php.

“Shock Waves Demolish Alang.” (March 2004). Times Shipping Journal.

“India Media Ban Over ‘toxic’ ship.” (February 13, 2006). BBC News.

McGowan, Robert. (November 14, 2003). “Asian Draw for Ship-Breaking.” BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3266963.stm.

Secretariat of the Basel Convention, United Nations Environment Program, Switzerland. http://www.basel.int/.

“Improving Conditions in Shipbreaking.” International Metalworkers Foundation. http://www.imfmetal.org/main/index.cfm?n=47&l=2&c=8268.

Puckett, Jim. (January 23, 2007). Basel Action Network. Personal communication.

This fact sheet was produced By Samantha L. Jones as part of the China Environment Forum’s partnership with Western Kentucky University on the USAID-supported China Environmental Health Project.

Source: The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. February 01, 2007

30 June 2006

Ship Recycling: - Data Management

The upcoming IMO-Instrument on Ship Recycling requires, among other things, a compendium of detailed information related to built-in materials, which must be kept up-to-date during the entire operating life of a ship. Germanische Lloyd assists her customers through the establishment of an appropriate format.

Single List and Inventory

The core of the above mentioned compendium would be the “inventory”, which is analogous to a Hazardous Materials blueprint. With this inventory, the location of built-in components containing hazardous materials can easily be determined. The “Single List” provides a listing of which materials are considered potentially dangerous. All components must be checked against the Single List, and as soon as one of the mentioned materials is found to be contained in a component, further information related to the type and the amount of the hazardous material must be included in the inventory. If none of the mentioned materials are present, this fact must be documented by the manufacturer in the form of an assurance certificate. Information that is gathered during the planning and/or building phase of a new ship, and during new installation of components, is to be included. The inventory must be kept upto-date, in large part onboard ship, throughout the operating life of the ship as it will be reviewed during, among other things, inspections and before recycling.

Requirements for Shipyards and Suppliers, Data Management

Shipyards will be required to produce the inventories for new and refitted ships.  In this regard, they will be dependent on information provided by suppliers. For this reason, GL recommends a structured gathering of information so that later requirements will be more easily met. Only in this way can a system, which provides information for safe and environmentally appropriate ship recycling, be implemented while maintaining reasonable costs, and while following legal requirements.

The overview looks like the following:


The Following procedures are recommended by GL: 

- Send background information (ex. this newsletter) to suppliers / manufacturers with a current Single List

- Require specific information about materials/components from the above in a specified format

- Information to be provided by suppliers/manufacturers:
  • Listing of any additional international recycling guidelines for the supplied products
  • Listing of the relevant contents (name, type, amount, etc.), and in the case of mixed materials, the corresponding breakdown and/or specific properties
  • In case of missing information details, a certificate should be provided using “best available knowledge”, and complete details should be supplied when available
  • Absence of listed materials is to be documented by the manufacturer in the form of an assurance certificate
- Collection and maintenance of the data in an IT-supported Inventory-Systems in the shipyard:
  • Relating hazardous materials to components in locations and / or systems
  • Link the data with maintenance sofware (in the future)
Source: Germanischer Lloyd. Suggestions for Shipyards and Suppliers, June 2006 

01 May 2006

Bangladesh Govt bans scrapping toxic ship, Alfaship:

The government issued a temporary order Saturday refusing to allow scrapping of an oil tanker which, according to Greenpeace, contains toxic materials.

Alfaship, formerly named Alfa America, is one of the 50 ships the international environmental group Greenpeace has put on its watch-list of vessels believed to be contaminated.

The Bahamian-flagged ship arrived at Chittagong Port on Thursday and a shipbreaking yard owner, who now owns the oil tanker, sought government permission for scrapping it.

"We have refused permission for its scrapping in our waters after we saw its name on the Greenpeace watch-list," said Mercantile Marine Department Principal Officer Habibur Rahman.

He said, "The government has formed a probe committee including government officials and environment and nuclear wastes experts, which will inspect the ship to make a final decision on whether to allow the ship to be dismantled here or not."

But he did not give any timeframe for the decision.

The Greenpeace site does not mention what contaminants Alfaship contains and the Bangladesh authorities concerned also have no information about the alleged toxic materials.


Environmental activists here have censured the arrival of Alfaship in Bangladesh waters without government permission.

"The entry of Alfaship is illegal because it's a toxic ship. We have served a legal notice on the government so that it tells the ship to leave Bangladesh waters," Rizwana Hassan of Bangladesh Environment Lawyers' Association said.

The oil tanker was built in Nagasaki, Japan, and was sold to Polembros Shipping Ltd of Greece in 2002. It was last anchored off St Petersburg, Russia on August 28, 2005, according to Greenpeace.

Kashem, who owns a shipbreaking yard, later bought the vessel, he told the news agency.

Last February, the government refused to allow the scrapping of the asbestos-lined luxury ocean liner SS Norway in Sitakunda shipbreaking area, the second biggest in the world after Alang in India.

That ban came a day after French President Jacques Chirac had ordered the asbestos-lined warship Clemenceau, on its way to India for scrapping, back home from the Indian Ocean.

Shipbreaking yards in Bangladesh dismantle up to 80 ships, mostly oil tankers, a year. Operating on Sitakunda beach, 25 kilometres or 17 miles north of Chittagong City, they directly or indirectly employ 300,000 people.

Source: The Daily Star. 1 May 2006

ALFA AMERICA - IMO 7716048


Photographer: Enrico Righetti       

Ship Name: ALFA AMERICA
IMO number: 7716048
Category: Crude Oil Tankers
Description: 1979 Mitsubishi ex FINA AMERICA, NORDIC FAITH, renamed ALFASHIP. Scrapped Bangladesh April 2006
Gt: 51474
Dwt: 90000
Ship Name: SING LEE
IMO: 7716048
Flag: Bahamas

Source: ShipSpotting.Com